Browse
Log in / Register
Share
For driving enthusiasts seeking maximum fun within Audi's compact RS lineup, the more practical and compliant RS 3 sedan emerges as the more livable and recommendable choice over the harsh-riding TT RS coupe. Despite sharing an identical, potent 400-horsepower powertrain, significant differences in suspension tuning and daily comfort create a clear divide between these two performance machines.
The Audi RS 3 sedan and TT RS coupe present a fascinating comparison for shoppers focused purely on a thrilling driving experience. On paper, their symmetry is remarkable. Both are powered by the same turbocharged 2.5-liter five-cylinder engine, producing 400 horsepower and 354 pounds-feet of torque. Each sends power to all four wheels through Audi's renowned Quattro all-wheel-drive system and a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission. This shared heart suggests a similar character, but real-world driving reveals two distinct personalities shaped primarily by their chassis and suspension setups.
| Specification | 2018 Audi RS 3 | 2018 Audi TT RS |
|---|---|---|
| Starting MSRP (incl. destination) | $55,875 | $65,875 |
| Engine | Turbocharged 2.5L 5-cylinder | Turbocharged 2.5L 5-cylinder |
| Horsepower | 400 hp | 400 hp |
| Torque | 354 lb-ft | 354 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph Time | 3.9 seconds | 3.6 seconds |
| Fuel Economy (city/hwy/combined) | 19/28/22 mpg | 19/29/22 mpg |
| Key Differentiator | RS-tuned Magnetic Ride Adaptive Suspension | RS Fixed Sport Suspension (with Dynamic Plus Package) |
The core of both cars is a turbocharged 2.5-liter five-cylinder engine, a configuration known for its distinctive sound and strong power output. While the acceleration figures are impressive—3.9 seconds for the RS 3 and a quicker 3.6 seconds for the TT RS—the driving experience reveals a common quirk. Peak torque arrives low at 1,700 rpm, but maximum horsepower isn't achieved until 5,900 rpm. This means that to access the full performance, the engine must be kept at high revs, a task managed by using the paddle shifters. Based on our assessment experience, the power delivery lacks the immediate urgency some might expect from 400 horsepower, feeling more like a build of momentum than a sharp, explosive punch. This characteristic is slightly less pronounced in the lighter TT RS but is a defining trait of this particular powertrain in both vehicles.
The handling comparison is where these two cars diverge most significantly. The RS 3 features an RS-tuned magnetic ride adaptive suspension, which allows the driver to adjust the dampers from a stiffer, sportier setting to a more comfortable mode. Even in its firmest setting, the RS 3's ride is manageable for daily use. Its steering is also an improvement over standard Audis, with less on-center slack and quicker responses, providing greater confidence.
The TT RS, especially when equipped with the optional Dynamic Plus Package that includes a fixed sport suspension, offers superior agility. It bites into corners with more conviction and feels more planted and responsive on a smooth, winding road. However, this advantage comes at a severe cost to ride quality. The fixed suspension is exceptionally harsh, transmitting nearly every pavement imperfection directly into the cabin. This stiffness crosses the line from sporty to punishing, making it difficult to live with on anything but perfect tarmac.
For a vehicle that may be used as a primary car, the TT RS's ride quality can indeed be a deal-breaker. The joy found in its sharp handling on a perfect road is overshadowed by its punishing behavior during normal driving. The RS 3, while not as razor-sharp as the TT RS at its limit, provides a far more balanced and tolerable experience day-to-day. Its adaptive suspension is the key, offering a legitimate comfort mode that makes commuting and highway driving acceptable. The TT RS's lack of compliance ultimately limits its usability and appeal unless it is strictly a weekend toy for track-focused driving.
Choosing between the Audi RS 3 and TT RS ultimately comes down to prioritizing ultimate agility versus daily driveability. For most driving enthusiasts, the RS 3 is the more rational and comfortable choice without sacrificing tremendous performance.
In a direct comparison focused on a blend of performance and livability, the RS 3 sedan wins by being the more well-rounded and usable high-performance vehicle. Shoppers craving sharper feedback may find a more compelling alternative in a competitor like the BMW M2, which offers telepathic steering without the punishing ride.
